Check out "Rise Up!" on WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS !
http://wellregulatedamericanmilitias.com/video/rise-up-1
These remarks were delivered by Paul E. Vallely,
MGEN, (ret) former Deputy Commanding General, Pacific at the Lincoln Reagan Dinner Saturday June 5th, 2010 in Virginia City, Montana.
I will be shoulder to shoulder with my Patriot Brothers,
AR in hand and at the ready when necessary.
MANY OTHER AMERICAN WOMEN will be at your sides as well!
I hope we never have to, BUT WILL DO SO IF NECESSARY!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Aly
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Senators propose granting President Internet power!! A KILL SWITCH FOR THE INTERNET !!!
See the original story at:
WELCOME TO AMERIKKA, KOMRADS!
June 10, 2010 8:25 PM PDT
Read between the lines and see the potential for ABUSE!!
A new U.S. Senate bill would grant the president far-reaching emergency powers to seize control of or even shut down portions of the Internet.
The legislation announced Thursday says that companies such as broadband providers, search engines, or software firms that the government selects "shall immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed" by the Department of Homeland Security. Anyone failing to comply would be fined.
That emergency authority would allow the federal government to "preserve those networks and assets and our country and protect our people," Joe Lieberman, the primary sponsor of the measure and the chairman of the Homeland Security committee, told reporters on Thursday. Lieberman is an independent senator from Connecticut who caucuses with the Democrats.
Do you REALLY want THIS MAN
TO HAVE ULTIMATE CONTROL
OVER THE INTERNET???
Because there are few limits on the president's emergency power, which can be renewed indefinitely, the densely worded 197-page bill (PDF) is likely to encounter stiff opposition.
We can only HOPE!
TechAmerica, probably the largest U.S. technology lobby group, said it was concerned about "unintended consequences that would result from the legislation's regulatory approach" and "the potential for absolute power." And the Center for Democracy and Technology publicly worried that the Lieberman bill's emergency powers "include authority to shut down or limit Internet traffic on private systems."
The idea of an Internet "kill switch" that the president could flip is not new. A draft Senate proposal that CNET obtained in August allowed the White House to "declare a cybersecurity emergency," and another from Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) would have explicitly given the government the power to "order the disconnection" of certain networks or Web sites.
(They try to discredit any one or thing that doesn't agree with their position on things NOW, do you REALLY want them to have THIS KIND OF POWER??)
On Thursday, both senators lauded Lieberman's bill, which is formally titled the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, or PCNAA. Rockefeller said "I commend" the drafters of the PCNAA. Collins went further, signing up at a co-sponsor and saying at a press conference that "we cannot afford to wait for a cyber 9/11 before our government realizes the importance of protecting our cyber resources."
SOUNDS like a CONVENIENT EXCUSE TO ME to limit your
1st AMENDMENT RIGHTS ON THE INTERNET!
Under PCNAA, the federal government's power to force private companies to comply with emergency decrees would become unusually broad. Any company on a list created by Homeland Security that also "relies on" the Internet, the telephone system, or any other component of the U.S. "information infrastructure" would be subject to command by a new National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC) that would be created inside Homeland Security.
The only obvious limitation on the NCCC's emergency power is one paragraph in the Lieberman bill that appears to have grown out of the Bush-era flap over warrantless wiretapping. That limitation says that the NCCC cannot order broadband providers or other companies to "conduct surveillance" of Americans unless it's otherwise legally authorized.
Lieberman said Thursday that enactment of his bill needed to be a top congressional priority. "For all of its 'user-friendly' allure, the Internet can also be a dangerous place with electronic pipelines that run directly into everything from our personal bank accounts to key infrastructure to government and industrial secrets," he said. "Our economic security, national security and public safety are now all at risk from new kinds of enemies--cyber-warriors, cyber-spies, cyber-terrorists and cyber-criminals."
AND DON'T FORGET THE "OTHER" CRIMINALS, THE PEOPLE WITH OPPOSING OPINIONS THAT MAKE THE CITIZENRY AWARE OF WHAT THE GOVERNMENT MAY BE DOING !!
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Obama vs. Israel – AGAIN! (Asskisser in Chief)
However, Obama and his cronies do not intend to let this “lapse” pass. FOUR times, Netanyahu has apologized. It apparently is not enough.
According to a CNSNews.com post this afternoon:
Biden twice during his visit to the region condemned the decision to build 1,600 housing units in a part of the city claimed by the Palestinians, the administration appears unwilling to let the matter lie.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a 45-minute phone conversation Friday morning, gave Netanyahu a dressing down, and the same day the Israeli ambassador, Michael Oren, was summoned to the State Department to hear further protests, this time from Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg.
Clinton later told NBC and CNN in separate interviews that the Israeli decision was “insulting,” and on Sunday, President Obama’s advisor David Axelrod, on ABC’s This Week, called it an “affront” and “destructive.”
First of all, what business is it of OURS what Israel does in Israel’s land ?? Joe Biden condemned the decision? So??? And Israel should care because…..?????
Secondly, who the HELL does Hillary Clinton think she is, ‘dressing down” the Prime Minister of a sovereign state? How exactly is Israel’s decision to build houses in a part of Jerusalem “insulting”?? What right does ANYone in this country, let alone our supreme rulers have to dictate to anyone else what they can or cannot do in their own country, when it does not directly affect the welfare of OUR country? Why is it paramount that we suck up to Palestine while simultaneously trashing our longstanding ally? Are we so afraid of stepping on the toes of any of the Muslim nations… oh, wait… yes, we are so afraid of stepping on the toes of any of the Muslim Nations. Especially since we now have a Muslim in Chief.
The CNSNews article goes on to say:
Axelrod said he would not discuss what conversations had been held with the Israelis aside from the public comments, but he thought the Israelis understood clearly “what we want moving forward.”
Israeli media said the government was coming under pressure to announce concessions to the Palestinian Authority (P.A.).
The Jerusalem Post said the U.S. was believed to be pressing Netanyahu to cancel the housing project, and to take further “confidence-building” steps such as releasing more Palestinian prisoners.
P.A. Chairman Mahmoud Abbas has threatened to withdraw from planned U.S.-mediated indirect talks because of the issue, and Abbas’ aide, Nabil Abu Rdainah, said at the weekend that for the talks to take place, Netanyahu would have to annul the housing decision.
To do so, however, would go counter to the prime minister’s position that his government’s temporary freeze on “settlement” construction – agreed last October under pressure from Washington – explicitly does not include Jerusalem.
According to this article, Israeli rulers have for all their history maintained that Jerusalem is Israel’s undivided capital. If Netanyahu were to reverse this, it would be devastating to his coalition and to Israel.
How would WE react if, say… Venezuelans decided that half of Washington DC should be ceded to them. And they decided to take up residence there, and fight Americans for it, for the next 200 years; fighting and fighting, blowing up school children, and police stations, and killing wedding parties, and people out shopping for their dinners; Venezuelan (I’m just using Venezuela as an example, don’t forget) suicide bombers blowing themselves and dozens of innocent bystanders to smithereens on a daily or weekly basis. Finally, after 2 centuries of fighting, Venezuela and the US decide to sit down at a table with an Israeli (for the sake of argument and fairness to my suppositions) leader as a moderator. Israel decides it is in everyone’s best interest if the US just go ahead and let the Venezuelan’s take … oh… half of DC. They draw a little chalk line down the middle of Pennsylvania Avenue; and one side is United States territory, and the other is Venezuelan. Now, We The People are pretty tweaked over this, because for all of our history, Washington DC has been OURS. Now, it belongs also to an interloper, destroyers and murderers who hate the very breath in our lungs. Would we stand idly by and let Israel tell us to just cut it out, and let Venezuela have DC? I don’t think so. I think we would slap the Israeli moderator in the head and tell him to take a hike. And we would do what we knew was the right thing to do for our own country.
Okay, maybe my example is a little simplistic; but you get my point. Where does THIS administration get off by threatening Israel? What will the United States do when they no longer have Israel as the buffer zone between all of the terror that is the Muslim states, and us? Especially with the way that our illustrious leaders have bent their knees and kissed the asses of the other leaders, much to their amusement.
This can lead to nothing good. One wonders why I am surprised. Nothing Obama and his administration of inexperienced nincompoops have done has been to the betterment of America or her people. Why should they start now?
I would just like to finish by saying, Israel, for what it is worth, *I* am sorry.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
