START TREATY / NUCLEAR ARMS VOTE IN THE US SENATE

THIS is a complete list of how each Senator voted.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00292

If you go to the link, ALSO NOTICE 3 REPS and 3 DEMS WHO DID NOT CAST A VOTE!!!!!

(I DON'T WANT THEIR EXCUSES FOR WHY THEY DIDN'T VOTE,

I WANT THEM TO TAKE A STAND!)

HERE ARE THE NAMES OF THE 3 OTHER "SELL OUT" REPUBLICANS:

>>>> Not Voting - 5 <<<<

Bond (R-MO)

Brownback (R-KS)

Gregg (R-NH)

Wyden (D-OR)

Bayh (D-IN)

SO, applying logic;

If you DON'T CAST A DISSENTING VOTE,

isn't that the SAME THING AS TACITLY IMPLYING YOU ARE WITH THE WINNERS?

"I DO NOT WANT THEIR EXCUSES FOR WHY THEY DIDN'T VOTE, I WANT THEM TO TAKE A STAND!"

We need to keep up the pressure on these guys. THIS LITTLE NOTE HERE IS EXACTLY ONE OF THE THE REASONS THE GOVERNMENT WANTS CONTROL OF THE INTERNET AND MEDIA!

This Senate HAS PUSHED THROUGH more LAWS (which aren't Constitutional) than any other Senate has!!  They took GREATER measures to make the greatest number of Americans dependent on the GOVERNMENT than AN OTHER CONGRESS!

THIS SENATE ADVANCED THE SOCIALIST AGENDA, FOLKS!
IS THAT THE "CHANGE" YOU VOTED FOR???

People MIGHT actually WAKE UP IF THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T CONTROL THE INTERNET!

At the risk of sounding REALLY "looney tunes", I'm going to bring something up.

(THINK OUT SIDE OF THE BOX!!!)

I THINK THEY ARE SETTING UP FOR THE 2012 ELECTIONS,

Limit the peoples access to knowlege, make them despirate financially, jump start the animosity, anger and frustration of the people to cause riots (like in Greece, France and Great Brittain), then it

GIVES THEM THE EXCUSE TO INSTITUTE MARTIAL LAW!!!!

Think it's far fetched? Begin to think analytically, IT HAPPENED IN NEW ORLEANS IN 2005 AFTER KATRINA. THE AUTORITIES WENT DOOR TO DOOR COLLECTING THE FIREARMS. I have a friend FROM New Orleans who re-located here AFTER Katrina...

Have you noticed how the timing on all of this stuff

("CONTROL" BILLS IN THE SENATE) is SPEEDING UP?

NET NEUTRALITY- INTERNET & OPINION CONTROL

START TREATY-REMOVING OUR ABILITY TO DEFEND OUR SELVES

CONTROL OF THE BANKS

CONTROL OF AUTO MANUFACTURERS

CONTROL OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM

CONTROL OF THE FOOD YOU EAT (ATTEMPTING ANYWAY)
NY CITY ( Bloomberg) already has control of SALT!!!

The Senate is paying off political debts now with OUR freedom, it is sameless.

They THEY go on recess... ITS ALL ABOUT THE SENATES PRORITIES, NOT THE PEOPLES.

Snopes got Snoped!

http://hubpages.com/hub/Snopes-got-Snoped

Snopes is run by a man and a woman, with no background or training in investigations, using Google.

Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. Once a negative article is posted by them, people point and say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!"

But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in investigative research.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago. After a few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and neutral. But, over the past couple of years people started asking questions when Snopes was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in controversial issues.

In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville, Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet. The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inaccuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.

But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet, Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the "final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their "fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the "main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others, as being particularly biased and agenda-motivated.

So, if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have heard, by all means, do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you were a liberal with an Internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com either as their team of amateur editors have also been caught in a number of bold-faced liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate and their religious treatment of Obama.) Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding that they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things conservative. Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read their sources for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do.

WHAT ISLAM IS NOT...

http://www.nmatv.com/video/618/What-Islam-Is-Not

Maine: Muslim Teen Sets off Chemical Bomb near Mosque

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/teenager-responsible-for-chemical-bomb.html

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Maine: Muslim Teen Sets off Chemical Bomb near Mosque

Once again we find that a violent  incident at a mosque was committed by ........a Muslim. This is the pattern. But this latest incident is deeply troubling for more nefarious reasons. This wasn't merely a hoax hate crime committed by a Muslim to stoke the bogus Islamic supremacist narrative of "islamophobia," this was a young Muslim experimenting with a bomb -- practicing his craft at his local mosque. Got that?

Islamic leaders told police the explosion was just a 13-year-old "experimenting." What was the kid trying to do? "Teenager responsible for chemical bomb near Islamic Society of Portland," by Helen Dailey for WCSH6.com, September 22 (thanks to Joe):

PORTLAND, ME (NEWS CENTER) -- Police say there were no injuries or damage caused by a chemical bomb that went off in a parking lot near the Islamic Society of Portland.

The bomb went off in the lot between the Islamic Society and Back Bay Grill around 8:00 PM Tuesday night. Portland Police say Islamic elders came forward to tell them that a 13 year old from the Society was experimenting and was responsible for the bomb. Another bomb was also found undetinated [sic]....

Just a young Muslim at a mosque experimenting with a bomb. In Maine. What's to be concerned about? It isn't as if mosques have ever been centers of violence elsewhere, right?

Muslims whine about "Islamophobia," refuse to address jihad terrorism and Islamic supremacism

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/09/maryland-muslims-whine-about-islamophobia-refuse-to-address-jihad-terrorism-and-islamic-supremacism.html


Sep 23, 2010

Muslims whine about "Islamophobia,"
but refuse to address
jihad terrorism and Islamic supremacism

If Muslims really wants to cure "Islamophobia," here is an easy way. They can:


1. Focus their indignation on Muslims committing violent acts in the name of Islam, not on non-Muslims reporting on those acts.


2. Renounce definitively not just "terrorism," but any intention to replace the U.S. Constitution (or the constitutions of any non-Muslim state) with Sharia even by peaceful means. In line with this, clarify what is meant by their condemnations of the killing of innocent people by stating unequivocally that American and Israeli civilians are innocent people.


3. Teach Muslims the imperative of coexisting peacefully as equals with non-Muslims on an indefinite basis.


4. Begin comprehensive international programs in mosques all over the world to teach against the ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supremacism.


5. Actively work with Western law enforcement officials to identify and apprehend jihadists within Western Muslim communities.


If Muslims do those five things, voila! People like me will no longer suffer from the illness of "Islamophobia"!


And Pamela Geller said it best: "Muslims in the U.S. are not the ones living under death threat. People who are standing up to jihad activity and Islamic supremacism are. They are not the ones targeted. We are. They are not getting death threats. We are. They don't have to live with 24/7/365 heavy duty security, Geert Wilders does. Wafa Sultan, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Robert Spencer, Ibn Warraq, Salman Rushdie, the producers from Comedy Central, and accidental counter-jihad tourists like Molly Norris live under death threat. As do I."

Indeed, I have a stalker who has threatened my life and posted private information about me online with the clear intention of inciting Muslims to attack me, who lives in College Park, Maryland. I wonder if he attended this forum -- the Nyumburu Cultural Center is in that city.

"Panel discusses cause and effect of Islamophobia in the U.S.," by Melissa Quijada in the DiamondbackOnline, September 23 (thanks to Tipster):

Scattered views filled a forum yesterday as students and activists addressed the fear of Islam and Muslims that's recently resurfaced in the media, agreeing the term Islamophobia should be discussed emphasizing similarities, not differences.

Last night at the Nyumburu Cultural Center, the Black Male Initiative student group hosted a discussion of about 100 students and activists to address social tensions amid a recent surge of anti-Islamic sentiments. Supported by the Muslim Students' Association and the Muslim Women of Maryland members, the event challenged the word and filled seats.

"It's important for us as engaged citizens and human beings to speak out against these injustices when they rear their ugly heads," said Solomon Comissiong, Nyumburu Cultural Center's assistant director of student involvement and public relations, as he opened the panel.

And when discussing an issue that often creates deep divides, panelists emphasized the importance of unity in tackling such a phenomenon.

"The existence of 'Islamophobia' is a social failure," said Secretary of the Muslim Students' Association Osama Eshera. "This is an issue we all have to deal with together."

Panelists paid specific attention to a string of anti-Islamic events, many of which have recently made national headlines, that led to the discussion held last night.

Dave Zirin, a sports writer and socialist activist who co-monitored the event with Comissiong, referenced the New York City cab driver who was stabbed in the throat, face and arm after disclosing his Muslim faith. Comissiong cited the national unrest earlier this month when Florida pastor Terry Jones threatened to burn copies of the Qur'an in protest of efforts to build a mosque near Ground Zero.

Of course, the New York cabbie stabber worked for a pro-Ground Zero mosque group, so it is hard to pin his actions on "Islamophobia." And it's outstanding moral myopia to tut-tut at the Qur'an-burning but not at the Muslims who murdered innocents because of it.

"We thought it was necessary to do something like this in light of all the anti-Muslim backlash," Comissiong said.

Much of the first half of conversation pointed to the terrorist acts of Sept. 11 as the root of fear and hatred of Islam.

"There's a notion that Muslims rejoiced while Americans suffered," said Eshera, a junior bioengineering major. "The reality is that about 300 Muslims died in the terrorist attacks."

Preposterous. A tenth of the people killed in the Trade Towers were Muslims? A ridiculous lie, but clearly one that Islamic supremacists have agreed upon, as it is oft-repeated lately.

A long line of both students and seasoned social activists stepped forward to ask questions and make comments, causing the event to run longer than expected. Some fundamentally challenged the term Islamophobia and the differences between Americanized fear against Muslims and the Islamic faith.

"You have an entire community calling it Islamophobia and a community of Muslims calling it Islamophobia," said university aluma and panelist Rayyan Ghuma. "It's all about semantics now."

"It takes us labels for us to do anything," said Omnia Joehar, junior government and politics major. "How many have stood up until 'Islamophobia' was made?"

Yesterday's discussion even spurred Elizabeth Rosenberg, co-president of the Interfaith Dialogue Project, to address the same topic with her group members next week.

Comissiong said he hoped the discussion was a start to spreading awareness so others can continue to address the issue on the campus.

"We want people to leave with a heightened consciousness," said Comissiong. "We want them to have a feeling of empowerment."

Oh, no worries, Mr. Comissiong. They feel plenty empowered.