PORTAL

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwLWFzEPVonC9dn44qIL5ASSs557asBGgx7UcyiQTM71fl7lk5yXWU1171I-LrLmpmXE6HCd_-iYRcWVrKJOX9kBzoht2EJ1hLyTZJgv5V7mkba99ZfFLH45gZCwNPwD0rHe25AfMkVWcX/s1600/animatfB.gif

Monday, November 15, 2010

Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/investigation-reveals-numerous-bogus-claims-on-obama-resume
April 3rd, 2010 7:15 pm ET

In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'

His claim turns out to be false.

 
As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be. The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false--

fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by 'the Blogging Professor,' the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a 'constitutional professor and scholar,' and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an 'instructor' at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about "Barry." Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.
The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).


Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a 'put-up job' as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position? And why?

Further, consider this:
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.


4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, "Obama did NOT 'hold the title' of a University of Chicago law school professor". Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law School.

(Click on pic to enlarge to read the title of book)

There is more from Ross, however: 

6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

You would THINK a former Constitutional attorney would NOT make up Constitutional quotes!  ("We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal...")
Um, wrong founding document, Mr. President. It is in our Declaration of Independence that we read: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in ourConstitution: the notion that we are all created equal."

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight. And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama's presence in their institutions.


BREAKING DEVELOPMENT--just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous 'journalists,' promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information 'they may discover.'

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. " ~ John Adams














 

Queen must wear a burqa: UK Islamists

Monday, November 2, 2009,11:10 [IST]

 http://news.oneindia.in/2009/11/02/queen-must-wear-a-burqa-uk-islamists.html#comments    


Queen must wear a burqa:
UK Islamists



London, Nov 2: After the appeal to convert Buckingham Palace into Buckingham Masjid, UK Islamists leader now insists that Queen Elizabeth II must wear a burqa if she has to go out.

Anjem Choudhary, spokesman for pro-sharia campaigners Islam4UK was quoted in Daily Express as saying, "If the Queen decides to go outside then she must cover herself like every woman."

The radical Islamists had also demanded that the Mall approaching Buckingham Palace be renamed as Masjid road.

Seeking to introduce the Sharia law, Choudhary said that the a dome and tannoy to call followers to prayer will be fitted in Buckingham Palace once the Sharia law is implemented.

Choudhary also said that the Queen will be stripped of all power under the new Sharia law.

At the same time he said that the in the year 2009 he awaits the fall of Rome, the White House and of course the Buckingham Palace.

OneIndia News



                                                 

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Is Obama Planning A False Flag Event?

Suspicion and Secrecy Swirl Around India Trip

"Upon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and brimstone, and an horrible tempest: [this shall be] the portion of their cup." Psalm 11:6

Something here is not right.

Obama and his team are planning what could be the strangest state visit trip in United States history. Consider this just in from the Daily Paul website -

"Obama is leaving the country just after the election. He is taking his wife and kids as well as 3,000 other people for this India trip. They are taking 40 planes, armored cars, helicopters, security forces, and a blank check book. They are planning on spending $200 million per day. At least that is what they are admitting to." source - Daily Paul

What is a false flag event? False flag operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time. source - Wikipedia



Obama's upcoming trip to India will involve the following:

• A fleet of 34 naval warships

• An Aircraft carrier

• His own personal limos imported from the US

• 800 hotel rooms booked at the Taj Mahal

• 500 US security personel

• Private luxury jets carrying hundreds of top American corporate CEO's

• Interception and obstruction devices

• US fighter jets

• The majority of his White House staff will travel with him

• They say the reason for all this security and cost is because of the extreme danger faced by the President...if that's true, then WHY is he taking his children with him??

• A fleet of over 40 high-tech cars for his convoy

• Cost for this 10-day trip is $200,000,000 million per day, making the 10 day event cost just over 2,000,000,000 (billion) dollars...are they visiting India or relocating?
source - NDTV

Now, all conspiracy theories aside, does this sound right to YOU? If you are honest you will have to say that no, it does not. But what it does sound like is that Obama and the entire guts that run this country are planning to leave the United States in a hurry.

Now consider this from the Daily Mail UK:
"The entourage will be the biggest ever in terms of logistics and manpower for any US president. The president himself will be ferried around in a black Cadillac - dubbed 'Barack Mobile' - which has its own built in communications centre - to enable Obama to be in touch with the White House, US vice president and the US strategic command The car also has the US nuke launch codes and the nuclear switch for the president. It can also withstand a chemical or germ warfare or even a bomb attack. Obama will be accompanied on the trip by US first lady Michelle Obama and their daughters Malia and Sasha, according to Indian newspaper Headlines Today. Earlier, Obama's daughters Sasha and Malia were not to be part of the trip. But Michelle's opinion prevailed and now the girls will accompany the first American couple to India, according to the paper." source - Daily Mail UK

Looks like to me that they are packing up and leaving...and then there's this from a few weeks ago:

We can absorb a terrorist attack. Really, Barack? A few weeks back Bob Woodward released a book, Obama's Wars, where Obama had something very unusual to say about 9/11 and the possibility of America being attacked again. The unbelievable, mind-numbing tragedy of 9/11, in Obama's mind, is something that could be easily absorbed should something of that magnitude happen on US soil again.


During an interview with Woodward in July, the president said, "We can absorb a terrorist attack. We'll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever... we absorbed it and we are stronger." Sounds to me like he is mentally preparing us for another terrorist or nuclear attack.

So you decide, dear reader, what this all means. But it sure does not sound right. And be prepared for anything at anytime, because something is coming...remember to the words of Jesus about life in the end times - "Behold, I have told you before." Matthew 24:25