Michael Schennum/The Arizona Republic
Weapons measures
Some of the bills aimed at loosening weapons regulations this session:
• Bills: House Bill 2307; Senate Bill 1098.
Sponsors: Rep. Nancy McLain, R-Bullhead City; Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa.
Summary: Exempts any firearm or ammunition manufactured and kept in Arizona from federal regulation, including registration.
Status: Passed by House Judiciary Committee, moves to Rules Committee; Senate bill was held in Senate Judiciary Committee.
• Bills: House Bill 2347; Senate Bill 1102.
Sponsors: Rep. Frank Antenori, R-Tucson; Pearce.
Summary: Would no longer require people to get a concealed-weapon permit. Would make it legal to keep a loaded weapon in a locked vehicle on school grounds and prohibit anybody younger than 21 from carrying a concealed firearm.
Status: House bill referred to House Military Affairs and Public Safety Committee and the House Judiciary Committee; Senate bill passed Senate Judiciary Committee, moves to Senate Rules.
• Bills: House Bill 2543; Senate Bill 1168.
Sponsors: Rep. David Gowan, R-Sierra Vista; Pearce.
Summary: Extends restrictions on local governments from regulating firearms and ammunition to include the purchase, acquisition, storage, licensing or registration of such items. The bill also would prohibit cities and counties from banning firearms in parks.
Status: House bill referred to House Military Affairs and Public Safety Committee and the House Judiciary Committee; Senate bill referred to Senate Judiciary Committee.
• Bill: Senate Bill 1011.
Sponsor: Sen. Jack Harper, R-Surprise.
Summary: Would allow a faculty member of a state university or community college who has a valid concealed-carry permit to carry a deadly weapon onto school grounds.
Status: Referred to Senate Public Safety and Human Services Committee.
• Bill: Senate Bill 1021.
Sponsor: Pearce.
Summary: Would expand instances when a person is justified in using deadly force.
Status: Passed Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Rules Committee, moves on to a full Senate vote.
• Bill: Senate Bill 1153.
Sponsor: Sen. Chuck Gray, R-Mesa.
Summary: Would prohibit local government from imposing any regulation on the possession, carrying, sale, transfer or manufacturing of knives.
Status: Passed Senate Judiciary Committee, moves on to Senate Rules Committee.
• Bill: House Bill 2406.
Sponsor: Antenori.
Summary: Would change the requirements for signs prohibiting the possession of weapons in restaurants and bars to within 20 feet of each register, at every entrance and behind the bar. Anybody who brings in a weapon would not violate the law if the signs weren't properly posted. The law currently requires a sign immediately adjacent to the liquor license.
Status: Referred to House Commerce Committee and House Judiciary Committee.
• Bill: Senate Bill 1015.
Sponsor: Harper.
Summary: Would also change the posting requirements for restaurants and bars but does not require the signs at all three areas (near registers, at entrances and behind the bar) - only at one.
Status: Referred to the Senate Commerce and Economic Development Committee.
Source: Legislation Online Arizona
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Sunday, January 31, 2010
OBITUARY
BORN 1776 - DIED 2008
IT DOES NOT HURT TO READ THIS SEVERAL TIMES
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning last November's Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million
McCain: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2..1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.
If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.
If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
IT DOES NOT HURT TO READ THIS SEVERAL TIMES
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning last November's Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million
McCain: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2..1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.
If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.
If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
Friday, January 29, 2010
The Eternal Tradeoff
Ultra-compact carry guns are cool indeed.
But you’d best learn to deal with their quirks.
By Patrick Sweeney
Previously Published in Guns and Ammo
Ok, we’re in the depths of summer, and for some of you it will stay hot for quite awhile. Others can look forward to a break in the heat in a while, but in the meantime we’re all sticky with sweat and tired of packing a big ‘ol blaster. We all want something smaller and easier to hide under hot-weather clothes.
But there is a catch (isn’t there always?) Compact guns come with their own demands. Like the cutest sister at a sorority house, an ultra-compact carry gun can be demanding and insistent. Some things just might not be good enough. And others, well, let’s just draw the curtain on this particular comparison.
Ultra-compact handguns, besides having specific needs in holsters, can be very particular about the ammunition they will work with. You may find that some combinations are simply unreliable, and not because the gun, the ammo, or your wallet are at fault. No, some things, like kimchee and key lime pie, just are not meant to go together.
Let’s start with you revolvoleros. You’ve suddenly discovered the benefits of packing an ultra-light snubbie. And not to pick on them, but let’s assume you went with an S&W 340PD. (Nice gun, by the way.) If you look at it closely, or even read the owners manual, you’ll see a warning laser-etched on the barrel shroud. It tells you not to use ammunition of less than 120 grains weight. Why? A little thing called bullet pull. You see, when you touch off a sub-critical nuke in the 340PD, recoil happens. The revolver moves back, as Sir Isaac noted, when the fired bullet moves forward. As the cylinder moves back, it snatches the remaining cartridges to the rear, and it snatches them by their rims. The bullets in the remaining rounds do their best to keep up, but if the recoil becomes brisk enough, they fail in that task.
The faster and more forceful the recoil, the greater pulling force on the bullets. If the bullet pull becomes great enough, the remaining rounds lengthen. Why the warning on lighter bullets and not on heavier ones? Wouldn’t the lesser recoil of the light bullets make the heavier bullet more likely to pull? Nope, you see, the weight of the heavier bullets comes with a longer bullet length. Longer length in the bullets means more friction in the case, and thus a greater resistance to pull. Don’t go putting all this on S&W, by the way. Any sufficiently lightweight revolver, using sufficiently powerful ammo, is going to experience this problem.
You snickering pistoleros, stop it. You have the opposite problem. When your featherweight pistol recoils, the rounds are rattled back and forth inside the magazine like the goodies in a miniature pinata. The timing of the short slide and the magazine spring lifting the rounds has to coincide, or you get failures to feed. What was a perfectly reliable compact 9mm with standard ammo may be a jam-a-matic with +P or +P+ ammo.
The hotter your carry ammo is, the more forcefully and more frequently those rounds bounce back and forth. If there is insufficient neck tension on your ammo, your rounds will shrink. If they don’t shrink in the magazine, the bullets may still have been loosened enough that when they get to the top and try to feed, they end up shortening when they are slammed into the feed ramp.
In both revolver and pistol instances, bad things are the usual result when you’ve selected the wrong ammo. Lengthening revolver rounds can quickly poke out the front of the cylinder, and stop rotation. Shortened pistol rounds can not only cause a failure to feed, but if they do make it to the chamber, their shortened length drastically increases chamber pressure.
"Hey, I don’t worry," you’re saying. "I only shoot factory ammo, not reloads." Sorry to burst your bubble, but factory ammo is not immune to these problems. I have a big stack of factory .45 ACP slowly crushing my selves that simply won’t feed in compact guns. The sort, choppy feeding cycle sets bullets back in the case, and they either stub on feeding, or the pressure spikes and the next round fails to feed. It also pulls in a revolver. When I find a handgun this stuff works in, I plan to blast it all off and reload the empties.
You cannot simply treat your defensive handgun as if it were some anti-virus software. You know, install and update (you do update your virus software, don’t you?) and forget about it while it runs in the background. This is a handgun, not a magic talisman. You have to feed it the ammo it likes.
So test your selected carry ammo in your carry gun, and make sure it does not give you these kinds of problems. But how to test? Simple, test one round to endurance. If you’re shooting a revolver, load the cylinder and fire one less than capacity. Reload, and fire one less again, leaving the same cartridge unfired both times. It has now been subjected to ten or twelve recoil impulses. Pull it out of the cylinder and compare it to an unfired cartridge. Any difference in length, and you can’t use that ammo in your revolver. Do the same with a pistol; load and fire all but one, extract it from the chamber, load it first in the mag again and repeat another magazine’s worth. Any shorter? Then you can’t use that ammo.
Now for the rest of the bad news: you aren’t getting the performance you expect. Any time you shorten a barrel, you get less velocity. You do, however, get much as much--or more--in recoil, so you’re paying more to get less. Yes, the math says you pay the same price, but shooting a .357 Magnum in a 45-ounce S&W Model 27, and shooting the same ammo in a 12-ounce 340PD is most definitely not the same experience. And, from the two-inch barrel, you’re not getting .357 performance either. Nor does any ultra-compact handgun avoid that problem. A 158-grain factory-loaded lead semi-wadcutter that easily goes 1,200-plus fps from a six-inch barrel and 1,050 to 1,100 from a four inch delivers only 907 fps in a sub-two-inch barrel. And it gives you a nuclear flash that makes it easy to identify the bad guys: the ones with scorch marks on their shirts.
That’s right, you’re paying the full .357 Magnum price in recoil, to get .38 Special+P performance. I can see the pistol guys laughing in their over-priced coffee beverages. You guys don’t escape, either. Physics is physics, and short barrels extract their tariff. A shortened 9mm can claw more than a couple of hundred feet per second off the full-sized pistol’s performance. Now, you aren’t going to find your ultra-compact 9mm suddenly turned into a "mere" .380, but you also aren’t going to be getting much over 1,000 fps, either. And you too will get the full "benefit" of noise and recoil from your +P or +P+ load.
How can you tell what you’re getting and if it is worth the cost? Only one way, and that is to chronograph your ammo.
If you want to know what your selected defensive ammo is doing, but you don’t want to spend the bucks on a PACT or CED chronograph, what to do? Simple: get yourself off to a practical shooting match. The rules call for ammo to be chronographed, to keep shooters from using PPC-type loads in the matches. Not all clubs chrono all the time, but most have a chronograph. Shoot the match, get some practice, get your match ammo and your defensive ammo chrono’d, and find out what you’re getting for the noise and recoil. You might even have some fun, too.
But you’d best learn to deal with their quirks.
By Patrick Sweeney
Previously Published in Guns and Ammo
Ok, we’re in the depths of summer, and for some of you it will stay hot for quite awhile. Others can look forward to a break in the heat in a while, but in the meantime we’re all sticky with sweat and tired of packing a big ‘ol blaster. We all want something smaller and easier to hide under hot-weather clothes.
But there is a catch (isn’t there always?) Compact guns come with their own demands. Like the cutest sister at a sorority house, an ultra-compact carry gun can be demanding and insistent. Some things just might not be good enough. And others, well, let’s just draw the curtain on this particular comparison.
Ultra-compact handguns, besides having specific needs in holsters, can be very particular about the ammunition they will work with. You may find that some combinations are simply unreliable, and not because the gun, the ammo, or your wallet are at fault. No, some things, like kimchee and key lime pie, just are not meant to go together.
Let’s start with you revolvoleros. You’ve suddenly discovered the benefits of packing an ultra-light snubbie. And not to pick on them, but let’s assume you went with an S&W 340PD. (Nice gun, by the way.) If you look at it closely, or even read the owners manual, you’ll see a warning laser-etched on the barrel shroud. It tells you not to use ammunition of less than 120 grains weight. Why? A little thing called bullet pull. You see, when you touch off a sub-critical nuke in the 340PD, recoil happens. The revolver moves back, as Sir Isaac noted, when the fired bullet moves forward. As the cylinder moves back, it snatches the remaining cartridges to the rear, and it snatches them by their rims. The bullets in the remaining rounds do their best to keep up, but if the recoil becomes brisk enough, they fail in that task.
The faster and more forceful the recoil, the greater pulling force on the bullets. If the bullet pull becomes great enough, the remaining rounds lengthen. Why the warning on lighter bullets and not on heavier ones? Wouldn’t the lesser recoil of the light bullets make the heavier bullet more likely to pull? Nope, you see, the weight of the heavier bullets comes with a longer bullet length. Longer length in the bullets means more friction in the case, and thus a greater resistance to pull. Don’t go putting all this on S&W, by the way. Any sufficiently lightweight revolver, using sufficiently powerful ammo, is going to experience this problem.
You snickering pistoleros, stop it. You have the opposite problem. When your featherweight pistol recoils, the rounds are rattled back and forth inside the magazine like the goodies in a miniature pinata. The timing of the short slide and the magazine spring lifting the rounds has to coincide, or you get failures to feed. What was a perfectly reliable compact 9mm with standard ammo may be a jam-a-matic with +P or +P+ ammo.
The hotter your carry ammo is, the more forcefully and more frequently those rounds bounce back and forth. If there is insufficient neck tension on your ammo, your rounds will shrink. If they don’t shrink in the magazine, the bullets may still have been loosened enough that when they get to the top and try to feed, they end up shortening when they are slammed into the feed ramp.
In both revolver and pistol instances, bad things are the usual result when you’ve selected the wrong ammo. Lengthening revolver rounds can quickly poke out the front of the cylinder, and stop rotation. Shortened pistol rounds can not only cause a failure to feed, but if they do make it to the chamber, their shortened length drastically increases chamber pressure.
"Hey, I don’t worry," you’re saying. "I only shoot factory ammo, not reloads." Sorry to burst your bubble, but factory ammo is not immune to these problems. I have a big stack of factory .45 ACP slowly crushing my selves that simply won’t feed in compact guns. The sort, choppy feeding cycle sets bullets back in the case, and they either stub on feeding, or the pressure spikes and the next round fails to feed. It also pulls in a revolver. When I find a handgun this stuff works in, I plan to blast it all off and reload the empties.
You cannot simply treat your defensive handgun as if it were some anti-virus software. You know, install and update (you do update your virus software, don’t you?) and forget about it while it runs in the background. This is a handgun, not a magic talisman. You have to feed it the ammo it likes.
So test your selected carry ammo in your carry gun, and make sure it does not give you these kinds of problems. But how to test? Simple, test one round to endurance. If you’re shooting a revolver, load the cylinder and fire one less than capacity. Reload, and fire one less again, leaving the same cartridge unfired both times. It has now been subjected to ten or twelve recoil impulses. Pull it out of the cylinder and compare it to an unfired cartridge. Any difference in length, and you can’t use that ammo in your revolver. Do the same with a pistol; load and fire all but one, extract it from the chamber, load it first in the mag again and repeat another magazine’s worth. Any shorter? Then you can’t use that ammo.
Now for the rest of the bad news: you aren’t getting the performance you expect. Any time you shorten a barrel, you get less velocity. You do, however, get much as much--or more--in recoil, so you’re paying more to get less. Yes, the math says you pay the same price, but shooting a .357 Magnum in a 45-ounce S&W Model 27, and shooting the same ammo in a 12-ounce 340PD is most definitely not the same experience. And, from the two-inch barrel, you’re not getting .357 performance either. Nor does any ultra-compact handgun avoid that problem. A 158-grain factory-loaded lead semi-wadcutter that easily goes 1,200-plus fps from a six-inch barrel and 1,050 to 1,100 from a four inch delivers only 907 fps in a sub-two-inch barrel. And it gives you a nuclear flash that makes it easy to identify the bad guys: the ones with scorch marks on their shirts.
That’s right, you’re paying the full .357 Magnum price in recoil, to get .38 Special+P performance. I can see the pistol guys laughing in their over-priced coffee beverages. You guys don’t escape, either. Physics is physics, and short barrels extract their tariff. A shortened 9mm can claw more than a couple of hundred feet per second off the full-sized pistol’s performance. Now, you aren’t going to find your ultra-compact 9mm suddenly turned into a "mere" .380, but you also aren’t going to be getting much over 1,000 fps, either. And you too will get the full "benefit" of noise and recoil from your +P or +P+ load.
How can you tell what you’re getting and if it is worth the cost? Only one way, and that is to chronograph your ammo.
If you want to know what your selected defensive ammo is doing, but you don’t want to spend the bucks on a PACT or CED chronograph, what to do? Simple: get yourself off to a practical shooting match. The rules call for ammo to be chronographed, to keep shooters from using PPC-type loads in the matches. Not all clubs chrono all the time, but most have a chronograph. Shoot the match, get some practice, get your match ammo and your defensive ammo chrono’d, and find out what you’re getting for the noise and recoil. You might even have some fun, too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
